ABOUT
PECS®
The
Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS®) is a unique augmentative/
alternative communication training package developed for use with
young children with autism and other social-communication deficits.
It has been used with hundreds of young children with autism and
other disabilities around the United States and in several other
countries. It is a system that does not require complex materials
or highly technical training.
Training
in the PECS® system is done in six phases.
Phase
I-The Physical Exchange
Upon
seeing a "highly preferred" item, the student will pick
up a picture of the item, reach toward the trainer, and release
the picture into the trainer's hand.
Phase
II-Expanding Spontaneity
The
student goes to his or her communication board, pulls the picture
object, goes to the adult, and releases the picture into the adult's
hand.
Phase
III-Picture Discrimination
The
student will request desired items by going to a communication
board, selecting the appropriate picture from an array, going
to a communication partner and giving them the picture.
Phase
IV-Sentence Structure
The
student requests present and non-present items using a multi-word
phrase by going to the book, picking up a picture symbol of "I
want," putting it on a sentence strip, picking out the picture
of what is wanted, putting it on the sentence strip, removing
the strip from the communication board, approaching the communicative
partner, and giving the sentence strip to him or her. By the end
of this phase the student typically has 20-50 pictures on the
communication board and is communicating with a wide variety of
partners.
Phase
V-Responding to "What do you want?"
Objective:
The student can spontaneously request a variety of items and can
answer the question "What do you want?"
Phase
VI-Responding and Spontaneous Commenting
The
student appropriately answers "What do you want?" "What
do you see?" "What do you have?" And similar questions.
Frequently
Asked Questions
|
1.
|
Will
using pictures prevent or interfere with the development
of speech?
|
|
|
We
have implemented PECS® with over 100 preschool children with
autism. There have been no documented cases of a child losing
established speech. Of course, there is no guarantee that
all children who use PECS® will develop speech. For children
older than 6 or 7, there are only a few known cases whereby
a child developed speech. It is important to understand
that PECS® is used because it provides a child with a rapidly
acquired functional communication system. The development
of speech is not the primary purpose of using PECS®. However,
the long-term data with over 70 preschoolers who have used
PECS® for over one year indicates that more than two-thirds
of these children have developed independent speech.
|
|
2.
|
How
many pictures do you introduce during Phase I? Do you present
the same pictures repeatedly?
|
|
The
number of pictures is dependent on the reinforcer assessment
and the number of trials/sessions, etc. needed for the student
to master Phase I. There have been many cases wherein a
student learned the first phase in fewer than 10 trials,
so only one picture was introduced. For students who need
more time, the number of pictures is determined by the number
of strong preferences and how they relate to the activities
occurring when Phase I training is being conducted.
|
| 3. |
Should
I just use the pictures in one setting such as snack when
I first start teaching a child the program?
|
|
The
very first trials within Phase I tarring typically take
place in a very structured format. The student might be
removed from ongoing activities initially to teach Phase
I. If Phase I mastery is not reached the first day of training,
it is important to conduct tarring in a variety of settings.
REMEMBER: try to have two trainers available to do this
training!
|
| 4. |
How
do you decide when to introduce new vocabulary?
|
|
New
vocabulary is added when the frequently conducted reinforcer
assessment shows the need. The number of pictures used in
Phases I and II is unlimited as long as only one picture
at a time is presented. Again, in Phase III, all of the
same pictures are used, but at the discrimination level
at which the child is working. We find it helpful to conduct
the reinforcer assessment and to use a vocabulary worksheet
such as in Appendix 3 to get ideas for pictures for requesting.
Once commenting and question answering is introduced, new
vocabulary can be added as quickly as the student can learn
it.
|
| 5. |
How
do you determine when it is appropriate to begin the discrimination
level (Phase III)?
|
|
There
can be some overlap between reaching mastery of Phase II
and beginning Phase III. For example, if a student has learned
to go to the communicative partner to give the picture,
but is still learning to go get his pictures, it is okay
to begin the discrimination training. What is important
to remember is not to ever end Phase II training. The crucial
component of PECS® is that the student be a persistent communicator-one
who nags rather than one who waits to be prompted to communicate.
Handing the student his communication book or going to the
student to receive the picture are cues on which the student
comes to depend.
|
| 6. |
Do
you color the symbols?
|
|
Some
practitioners prefer to use colored pictures at the preschool
level. Unless coloring the pictures is a branching step
used in discrimination training or you just love to color
(or know someone who does), coloring the pictures is not
necessary.
|
| 7. |
Do
you use individual systems
or classroom-based systems?
|
|
Each
student should have his/her own communication system that
goes with him/her where ever he/she goes. The system is
treated as if it were a part of the child (like a wheelchair
or orthopedic shoe) and the child must learn to be responsible
for it. It should not be up to the teacher or parent to
carry the book from setting to setting. Classroom or room-based
systems at home are extremely useful, too. These can be
"menu" boards that contain vocabulary specific
to the location. For example, in the bathroom there might
be a board containing pictures of soap, a towel, and bath
toys, etc., while at school in the motor area there might
be a board containing pictures of the equipment. What is
important to remember is that the student have a system
to take with him when he leaves the home or classroom where
the center-based boards are located.
|
| 8. |
How
do you determine the number of symbols to be used during
an activity?
|
|
If
the student is in Phase I or Phase II of training, no more
than one symbol is to be presented at a time. It is up to
the trainer to determine, from the reinforcer assessment
and from the natural routines which picture should be made
available at each point in an activity. If the child is
in Phase III of training, the number of symbols is determined
by the student's current discrimination abilities. Beyond
Phase III, all pictures should be available to the student.
|
| 9. |
Do
we teach PECS® in order to teach these kids to speak?
|
|
We
teach children (and adults) to use PECS® in order to rapidly
teach them important functional communication skills. These
skills start with learning to spontaneously ask for things
that are rewarding to the individual learning PECS®. We believe
it is important to teach everyone to initiate functional
communication skills within a social context. For an individual
who does not have these skills the selection of which modality
will be used is less important than the acquisition of the
fundamental skill. Therefore, we do not teach PECS® as a
way to speak, we teach it as a way to communicate. We have
been very pleased with the high proportion of young children
who acquire speech after using PECS® for a period of time
but, in some sense, the acquisition of speech can be viewed
as a fortunate by-product of the approach and not its direct
focus. Even for children and adults who do not acquire speech,
the acquisition of skills within PECS® leads to a much more
communicatively successful person.
|
| 10. |
When
is it OK to switch to pointing systems (including synthetic
voice devices)?
|
|
The
first, and perhaps most important aspect of PECS® training
involves teaching someone to approach another person prior
to communicating. Our concern with various pointing-based
picture (or symbol) systems has been that in the early aspects
of training, the child may not approach someone before using
the system. After a period of successful PECS® use, people
may be able to use a pointing system if they reliably approach
someone, get their attention and then deliver the message.
We have observed several children who used PECS® and subsequently
used pointing systems involving a combination of letters,
and printed words and phrases (both voice-output and print
devices).
|
| 11. |
If
a child is speaking with poor articulation (or similar problems)
while using the sentence strip, how should the teacher respond?
|
|
If
a girl approaches someone without her communication board
and voices something that is unintelligible, then we suggest
simply responding that you don't understand and that the
girl should get her board. Once the message (via the board)
is clear, then encouraging improved imitation of the word
or phrase may take place. However, if improved imitation
is not immediate, we suggest responding to the successful
message delivered via the sentence strip in an appropriate
manner. In this manner, the child is likely to be encouraged
to continue to approach us to communicate since he/she can
trust our reactions.
|
| 12. |
What
is the role of imitation training, especially vocal imitation?
|
|
Imitation
is an extremely important skill. Many children with autism
and related disabilities demonstrate very poor imitation.
Imitation may involve body actions (i.e., clapping hands),
manipulating objects (i.e., bouncing a ball), or vocal acts
(i.e., sounds, words, or phrases). If a child does not imitate
one of these types of behaviors, it is very important to teach
the skill. One of our primary concerns is that it is not necessary
to be able to imitate a word in order to be able to effectively
communicate. Many of the children we have worked with have
acquired important functional communication skills via PECS®
while they improved their imitation skills, including vocal
imitation. For many of these children, when their vocal imitation
skills significantly improved, they have been able to imitate
the words corresponding to the phrases that they construct
via the sentence strip. However, in our view, during the period
of time that they acquired vocal imitation they still were
able to communicate in a functional manner. Therefore, we
strongly suggest that while children are being taught PECS®,
parents and staff continue to put an emphasis upon acquiring
imitation skills. However, it is best to teach one skill per
lesson. Thus, during PECS® lessons imitation is not the focus
and, during imitation lessons PECS® is not the focus. Many
staff and parents work on vocal imitation within activities
where PECS® use is unlikely, as during playtime during which
the child already has desired items. Many staff use a morning-circle
routine to promote imitation of words, sometimes within a
song or other established routine. In short, there is no conflict
between PECS® and imitation training, nor is it an either/or
situation. The best practice seems to involve choosing goals
and strategies to match student needs and situational factors. |
References
Bijou,
S. W. and Baer, D. M. (1965) Child Development II Universal
stage of infancy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Meredith
Corp.
Bondy,
A. (1988, May). Autism and initial communication training:
How long have we been wrong? Paper presented at the Association
for Behavior Analysis convention, Philadelphia.
Bondy, A. and Frost, L. (1994a). The picture exchange communication
system. Focus on Autistic Behavior. 9, 1-19.
Bondy,
A. and Frost, L. (1994b). The Delaware Autistic Program. In S.
Harris and J. Handleman (Eds.), Preschool Education Programs
for Children with Autism (pp. 37-54). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Bondy,
A. andPeterson, S. (1990, May). The point is not to point:
Picture-exchange communication system with young students with
autism. Paper presented at the Association for Behavior Analysis
convention, Nashville, TN
Carr,
E. (1982). Sign language. In R. Koegel; A. Rincover; and A. Egel
(Eds.) Educating and Understanding Children with autism
(pp. 142-157). San Diego: College-Hill Press.
Ferster,
C. B. (1961) Positive reinforcement and behavioural deficits of
children with autism. Child Development, 32, 437-456.
Kanner,
L. (1943) Autistic disturbance of affective contact. Nervous
Child, 2, 217-250.
Mayer
and Johnson (1981, 1985, 1990). The Picture Communication Symbols,
vol. I, II, and III Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
Mirenda,
P. and Dattilo, J. ( 1987). Instructional techniques in alternative
communication for students with severe intellectual handicaps.
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 143-152.
Reichle,
J.; York, J. and Sigafoos, J. ( 1991 ). Implementing Augmentative
and Alternative Communication Strategies for Learners with Severe
Disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Disclaimer
Autism
is a complex disorder. The information presented here is, of necessity,
general in nature. Please consult with a qualified professional
concerning your specific questions. The opinions expressed herein
are those of the individual authors.
|